Whether a new company is the right move at all, and if so what shape it should take and who should own it, is the open point here. We take the plan as you describe it, test it against realistic structures and give you a written assessment with assumptions and open questions. It does not include registration, filings or a legal or tax opinion.
Some founders arrive with a jurisdiction already chosen from a forum post or a friend. The assessment reverses the order. It asks what the company will sell, who will own and direct it, where those people are resident, who will pay it and in which currencies, and only then which structures can carry that. The same product sold by an owner living abroad to consumers produces a different answer than the same product sold by a local resident to businesses.
The result is business and structuring analysis from public sources. It is not a legal or tax opinion, and where one is required the assessment says which question to put to a licensed adviser.
Short questions on the business, owners and money flows.
Structures that cannot carry the facts are removed with a stated reason.
Remaining options set against your priorities, with the trade-off of each.
Options, risks, assumptions, open questions and a recommended next step, then a walk-through call.
The live question can be whether a separate company adds anything over contracting personally, and what the owner's own residency does to that answer. The assessment may conclude that a company is premature.
Ownership split, who is a director and where decisions are taken become the central points. A structure that suits one founder can create a problem for the other.
Here the question is what the new entity is for and how it relates to the one you have, which is closer to a model review than a fresh setup.
Why it changes the answer: Where owners live shapes what a company can sensibly do. What we need from you: Where each owner lives and works.
Why it changes the answer: Regulated or licensed activities narrow the options quickly. What we need from you: What is sold, to whom, how.
Why it changes the answer: Currency, counterparties and payment providers constrain the structure. What we need from you: Expected sources and destinations of money.
Why it changes the answer: A structure for a trial differs from one meant to hold investment. What we need from you: Plans for partners, investors, exit.
A factor we cannot confirm from here is carried into the result as an open question, not guessed.
This is business and structuring analysis, not legal, tax or investment advice. Where a legal or tax opinion is needed, we say so and point you to a licensed adviser.
When the assessment points to a structure, the next step is registering it. See how a company is opened remotely as a non-resident.
No. It is business and structuring analysis. Where a legal or tax opinion is needed, we say so and point you to a licensed adviser.
No. Registration is a separate service. The assessment tells you whether and how to go ahead.
Say so in the request. We test that choice against your facts and tell you if the evidence points elsewhere. If the only open point is the place, the jurisdiction comparison is the closer fit.
No assessment can promise that. We say what is realistic and what depends on the provider.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Describe your plan and your constraints. We reply with what we would look at first.
Request an assessment