Do the operating links between your entities hold together? Payments, invoices, registrations and approvals between companies in different countries can be set up piecemeal. We map who does what for whom, where registrations are missing and where payments take awkward routes, and leave tax positions to your tax adviser. Not included: filings, registrations, and tax or transfer-pricing opinions.
Each entity may be sound in isolation. The trouble sits in between: one company invoices customers for work another performs, a third pays suppliers on behalf of both, and nobody has written down why. The review traces each flow from customer to cash, names the entity at every step and lists the registrations and payment routes each step may require, to be confirmed by a local professional.
We do not state tax positions, transfer-pricing views or filing obligations. Where such a point arises, it goes onto a list for your adviser with the reason it matters.
This is how each material flow is reviewed.
Who contracts, who invoices, in which currency.
Which entity performs it and where the people sit.
How cash reaches the entity that bears the cost.
Which registrations and records the flow may require, as a local professional confirms, and which you cannot show today.
The review traces which entity invoices, which pays staff, and whether the transfer between them has a written reason. The answer differs from a one-country group because each leg crosses a border.
The question is how cash returns to the parent and under what paperwork. What each country requires is for local professionals; the review lists the questions.
The review checks whose name is on the customer contract and who carries the cost, so the split is written down before money moves.
A recurring transfer between entities with no written reason is a question waiting to be asked.
Cross-border sales can create obligations the seller has not noticed; which ones depends on facts a professional must confirm.
If one individual holds every login and approval, the group is exposed to their absence.
Handled here: Yes, mapped and gaps listed. Handled elsewhere: not applicable.
Handled here: No, flagged. Handled elsewhere: Licensed tax adviser.
Handled here: No. Handled elsewhere: Corporate support service or local professional.
This is business and structuring analysis, not legal, tax or investment advice. Where a legal or tax opinion is needed, we say so and point you to a licensed adviser.
No. The review finds gaps; filings and registrations are separate.
No. We flag where a transfer-pricing question appears and refer it to a tax adviser.
No. Two entities in two countries can benefit from this picture.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Describe your plan and your constraints. We reply with what we would look at first.
Request an assessment