A service group may sign with clients in one entity while the people doing the work are employed in another. The review tests that arrangement: who contracts, who delivers, who invoices, and how the cost of shared staff moves between entities.
If a client in one country is billed by an entity that employs nobody working on their project, someone will eventually ask why. The review lays the contract, the delivery team and the invoice side by side for each major client and notes where they point to different entities.
Costs bought for clients can sit in the wrong entity and distort every later view of the group's result.
A team member who moves country can create a question for the group that nobody noticed. We flag it for a local professional.
Clients sometimes ask to be invoiced by a particular entity. The reasons and consequences should be understood before agreeing.
This is a sequence rather than a checklist; each step shapes the next.
Entities, their countries, and who is employed or engaged in each.
Pick two or three typical client projects and trace them from contract to payment.
Look for recharges, loans or settled balances between entities, and whether anything documents them.
Mark where staff location may create a registration or tax question for a local adviser.
This is business and structuring analysis, not legal, tax or investment advice. Where a legal or tax opinion is needed, we say so and point you to a licensed adviser.
No. Payroll is a local specialist matter. The review shows where staff are placed so you can ask the right question.
No. A setup assessment is for deciding a new structure; this reviews one that already operates.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Describe your plan and your constraints. We reply with what we would look at first.
Request an assessment