You own one or more foreign companies and no one can say with confidence why each exists. The open point is whether to keep, simplify or fix the structure. We map entities, owners, accounts and flows, then assess them against the goals you actually have today. It does not include closing or changing entities, filings or a legal or tax opinion.
Structures can accumulate. An entity is opened for a first customer, a second one for a bank that refused the first, a third because a partner insisted. Years later each is paying to exist, and nobody remembers which one holds the contract with the main client. The review starts by drawing what exists, then asks of every entity: what does it do, who benefits, what breaks if it is closed.
The review does not take tax or legal positions and does not carry out changes. Points that need a licensed adviser are collected into a list you can hand over.
Ownership scheme, list of entities and accounts, what each does and a financial summary.
Entities, owners and flows in one picture, with unknowns marked.
Against the goals you state, with each finding tied to a reason.
A written review with findings, options and questions for tax or legal advisers.
If it takes an afternoon to reconstruct who owns what, the structure has outgrown its documentation.
Workarounds age badly. They can become the part the business now depends on.
Selling the business, adding an investor or moving the owner's residence can make a once-sensible layout awkward.
Several entities mean several sets of records, addresses and recurring obligations, even when only one trades.
The review asks whether the second entity still has a job. If it only exists because the first was refused, the options are to keep it with a written role, fold its work into the first, or list the closing steps for an adviser.
The review maps who owns what and which entity signs the main contracts. The answer differs from a single-owner case because ownership and signing authority may sit in different places, and an adviser confirms the legal position.
The review asks where the owner now lives and who actually manages each entity. What that means for tax and management is a question for advisers in both countries; the review makes the question specific.
When it fits: Each entity has a clear role and records are in order. What it costs you: Little, but documentation may still need to be written.
When it fits: Overlapping or idle entities add recurring cost and confusion. What it costs you: Closing or merging has its own steps and risks, flagged for an adviser.
When it fits: Structure is sound but ownership, signing or records are unclear. What it costs you: Effort to clean up, which may be small compared with leaving it.
The review lists options and trade-offs; which step to take, and whether a specialist should execute it, is your decision.
This is business and structuring analysis, not legal, tax or investment advice. Where a legal or tax opinion is needed, we say so and point you to a licensed adviser.
Not in this service. The review states options. Closing or changing entities is carried out separately, often with a licensed adviser; LATYNEX Corporate Support coordinates filings.
No. We do not take tax positions. We flag where a tax adviser's view is needed and why.
That can happen. Missing records are listed as findings and open questions.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Describe your plan and your constraints. We reply with what we would look at first.
Request an assessment