Goods can be weighed and counted; services and software are priced on models that differ in nature. One vendor charges per seat, another per project, a third on a retainer. The question for a buyer is whether proposals for the same need can be restated so the real differences in scope, term and exit are visible.
You send the proposals and a statement of what you need. We list the deliverables each vendor commits to, what is optional, what depends on you, and which pricing model each uses. The result is a comparison of scope and commercial terms: what is included, what is billed separately, what ties you in, and what each proposal is silent on. Where a vendor states a figure, it is shown as the vendor wrote it, with the unit and period beside it.
This is a comparison of proposals as written. We do not assess whether software works, test it or review a contract, and we do not build or implement anything; that is a separate LATYNEX service.
What we pull out: Named deliverables, user or usage limits, environments covered. What may go unstated: What counts as a change request, and who decides.
What we pull out: Fixed, time-based, per unit of use or subscription, shown as stated. What may go unstated: How the price moves when your use grows or shrinks.
What we pull out: Initial term, renewal mechanism, notice stated. What may go unstated: Whether prices can change at renewal.
What we pull out: Access, data, people and decisions the vendor expects from you. What may go unstated: The effect on the vendor's commitments if these arrive late.
What we pull out: What the proposal says about returning or removing your material. What may go unstated: Format and cost of getting data out.
What we pull out: Stated channels, hours and targets, where given. What may go unstated: The remedy if a stated target is missed.
Wording on liability, data protection and indemnity is listed as present or absent only. Reading it for legal effect is for a lawyer.
The vendors price per user in different tiers. We rebuild each at your actual team size and feature list and show what each tier leaves out.
Proposals vary in how finely the work is broken down. We map each to a common list of deliverables and mark the ones an agency has folded into a general line.
The incumbent's terms are the baseline. We show where new proposals differ from what you already have, including items you receive today that are not in a new quote.
Research reports what can be established from public and provided sources. It is not a guarantee about a counterparty's future conduct and not legal advice.
Where you ask for it, the summary sets out which proposal ranks highest on the criteria you gave, stated with its assumptions. The choice and any negotiation remain yours.
The method is similar; the dimensions differ. There is no sample to handle, so the weight falls on scope, term and what happens at exit.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Tell us what you need to find out and by when. We confirm scope before any work starts.
Request research