Ownership is a part of a counterparty that its marketing shows only if the company chooses to. This review follows the public record upward from the entity as far as it goes, and then says plainly where the trail ends. It is a commercial reading of what is published, not a beneficial-ownership determination.
The first answer is the entity itself: its recorded name, form, status, registered address and any recorded officers or shareholders. The second is the layer above: if a shareholder is itself a company, its record is read in the same way. The report draws this as a short chain with the source at each link and a clear mark at the point where the public record gives out.
A chain that ends at a holding company with no published holders is a finding, not a failure. It tells you what to ask for directly.
Control can sit in agreements that no register shows. The report states recorded holdings and does not infer hidden control without a source.
Registers publish what was filed, when it was filed. The report gives the date of the latest filing it saw and notes that later changes may not yet appear.
Only publicly registered company roles are referenced. No personal background, no sanctions or politically-exposed-person screening.
The chain shows whether the entity you contract with is a member, a licensee or only shares a name.
The recorded dates show how recent the change is relative to the history the company presents.
The chain shows which entity above is named in the record, if it names one.
Any decision that relies on legal ownership should be confirmed by your lawyer from the documents themselves.
Match the name and number you were given to a single recorded entity, and list any near-identical records so the right entity is identified before going further.
Status, form, registered address and recorded dates, plus officers or shareholders where the register publishes them.
Each company shown as a holder is looked up in its own register where that register is open, and the chain is extended one link at a time.
Where the record shows an individual, an unlisted holding, a different register that is not open, or nothing, the report names which of these it is.
What the counterparty told you about its group is compared with the chain, and differences are listed with both versions.
Research reports what can be established from public and provided sources. It is not a guarantee about a counterparty's future conduct and not legal advice.
Only where public records show one. Where they do not, the report says the trail ends and where.
No. It is a commercial reading of public records and is not KYC, AML, PEP or sanctions screening.
No. It is a commercial reading of public records, with each finding sourced. Anything that relies on legal ownership should be confirmed from the documents themselves by your lawyer.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Tell us what you need to find out and by when. We confirm scope before any work starts.
Request research