You already buy this product and have decided to look beyond the current supplier. The question this page answers is narrow: which other candidates can match what the incumbent actually supplies, according to public sources. How a particular failure becomes screening criteria is a different question, taken up under use cases. The result is a shortlist and comparison matrix in which the incumbent sits as a reference row, so alternatives are read against the thing you are replacing.
The brief starts from the incumbent: what it supplies, in what form, at what volume and under which terms you hold. Candidates are screened for the same product scope. The attributes you hold constant decide the columns of the matrix, and every candidate is read against them.
The research looks forward to alternatives only. How to end an existing arrangement, and what a contract allows, is a legal question for you or your adviser.
Not only the one agreed on paper. If the delivered item drifted from the agreement, say so, because the like-for-like test uses the delivered version.
Quoted terms and order patterns enter the matrix as client-provided. They are not checked by us, and stay labelled that way in the report.
Which parts of what the incumbent supplies must be matched exactly and which may differ. The matrix is built on that line.
What the incumbent supplies and in what form, as you describe it and as its own public material shows it.
The order pattern and terms you hold, marked client-provided. Candidates of comparable scope are read against them; the research does not establish whether any candidate costs less.
Research reports what can be established from public and provided sources. It is not a guarantee about a counterparty's future conduct and not legal advice.
It shows candidates that match your criteria. Whether any is less costly is for you to establish with their own quotations.
Through the information you provide and its own public material, read the same way as for every candidate.
Then the report says which attribute removed most candidates, so you can decide whether to relax it.
No obligation. We read your request and reply with a straight answer.
Tell us what you need to find out and by when. We confirm scope before any work starts.
Request research